A/B testing

✅ Why this step helps you make evidence-based design decisions

When you're torn between two options, don’t guess—test.

A/B testing allows you to compare two (or more) versions of a product, feature, or message to see which performs better. It’s a fast, focused way to validate decisions based on real user behaviour—not opinions. Whether it’s button placement, packaging design, or onboarding flow, A/B testing turns uncertainty into data.

📘 What you’ll learn

  • Which version of a design, interface, or message users prefer—or use more effectively
  • How small changes affect usability, conversion, or satisfaction
  • Where subtle issues in design or flow may impact performance
  • What version delivers better results, not just better reactions

🛠️ Tools and methods

  • Controlled Variable Test Plan

    Change one thing at a time—button shape, label, layout, material, etc.

  • Sample Splitting

    Ensure users are randomly or evenly split across versions (A and B).

  • Data Capture Tools

    Use click tracking, time-to-complete, task success, or feedback scores.

  • Statistical Comparison

    Look for significant differences—not just small changes.

  • Follow-up Interview or Survey

    Ask why people preferred or responded to each version.

⚠️ Common mistakes

  • Testing too many things at once. You won’t know what caused the difference.
  • Too small a sample. A/B tests need enough users to show reliable trends.
  • Focusing only on clicks. Behaviour matters, but context and emotion do too.
  • Assuming test results = permanent truth. What works in one context may not generalise.

💡 From product teams

“Our A/B test showed the minimalist label outperformed the colourful one by 30%—but only for first-time buyers. That insight shaped our packaging rollout.”

– Brand Manager, Consumer Electronics Team

💡 Use A/B testing to resolve debates and move forward with confidence—not to endlessly stall decisions.

🔗 Helpful links & resources

✍️ Quick self-check

  • Have we defined a clear test variable and goal?
  • Are we splitting the test fairly across users or contexts?
  • Do we have a way to measure outcomes reliably?
  • Are we acting on the results—not just observing them?

🎨 Visual concept (optional)

Illustration: Two prototypes side by side—Version A with a round button and Version B with a square one. A user interacts with each while a data board shows results: “Time to complete: A = 12s, B = 9s”. A team member reviews a summary report titled “Test Complete: B Wins.”

Visual shows how A/B testing helps product teams choose smarter, not louder—by learning from users directly.
Scroll to Top